¹Jonalyn B. Zoleta,²Edilberto Z. Andal

^1,2Laguna State Polytechnic University, San Pablo City

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i7n06

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This experimental study focused on using interactive video-aided instructional material and its impact on achieving or mastering the learning competencies in Physical Education. The study participants were Grade 10 students at Lucena Dalahican National High School (LDNHS). Based on the 2 Most Essential Learning Competencies in Physical Education, the researcher created an interactive video lesson in Physical Education that covers the topics for the third quarter. In addition, the researcher utilized validated self-made interactive video lessons in Physical Education 10. The instrument used to collect data for this investigation was the researcher-devised pre- and post-test. The prototype of the evaluation tests was created based on the researchers' prior inquiries and readings. Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn. The pre-test scores of Grade 10 students in Physical Education covering the written and performance tasks are at a low mastery level. The posttest scores of Grade 10 students in Physical Education covering the written and performance tasks are moving toward mastery level. There was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the students when they were exposed to the interactivevideo materials connoting the effectiveness of the intervention material used. Moreover, the researcher recommends that since interactive-video materials have been proven effective, the interactive-video material could be used ona division-wide scale. The interactive-video material can be further developed and enhanced to obtain optimum results in the student's test scores.

KEYWORDS:

Interactive-Video Materials, Performance Tasks, Pre-test, Post-test, Physical Education, and Written Tasks

REFERENCES

1) Alberto Ortega-Maldonado*, Susana Llorens, Hedy Acosta, Cristián Coo. (2017) Face-to-Face vs. Online: An Analysis of Profile, Learning, Performance, and Satisfaction among Post Graduate Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(10): 1701-1706, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.051005

2) Agasisti, T., and Johnes, G. (2015). Efficiency, costs, rankings, and heterogeneity: the case of US higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 40, 60–82. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.818644

3) An, R. (2020). Projecting the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on childhood obesity in the United States: A microsimulation model. Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 9(4), 302–312. PubMed ID: 32454174 doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.05.006

4) Anderson, T. (2004). Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Canada: AU Press, Athabasca University.

5) Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments: Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.

6) Bersin & Associates. (2003). Blended learning: What works? An industry study of the strategy, implementation, and impact of blended learning. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates.

7) Crews, T. B., Wilkinson, K., & Neill, J. (2015). Principles for good practice in undergraduate education: Effective online course design to assist students' success. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11, 87–103

8) Demirkol, M., & Kazu, I. Y. (2014). Effect of blended environment model on high school student's academic achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 78–87.

9) Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81(6), 358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036316

10) EDUCAUSE. (2017) 2017 key issues in teaching & learning. Retrieved from https://www.EDUCAUSE.edu/eli/initiatives/key-issues-in-teaching-and-learning.

11) Jasmine Paul & Felicia Anderson (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009to 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007

12) Jeong, H.C., & So, W.Y. (2020). Difficulties of online physical education classes in middle and high school and an efficient operation plan to address them. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7279. doi:10.3390/ijerph17197279

13) J. Arias, John Swinton, & Kay Anderson. (2018). Online Vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random Assignment. E-Journal of BusinessEducation & Scholarship of Teaching Vol. 12, No. 2, September 2018, pp: 1– 23.

14) Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-Face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Front. Psychol. 5:1278. doi 10.3389/fps.2014.01278

15) Keramidas, C. G. (2012). Are undergraduate students ready for online learning? A comparison of online and face-to-face sections of a course. Rural Special Educ. Q. 31, 25–39. doi: 10.1177/875687051203100405

16) Kooiman, Brian & Sheehan, D. (2013). Bridging Online Physical Education and Technology-Assisted Physical Activity. DO - 10.2316/P.2013.808-014. Retrieved from (PDF) Bridging Online Physical Education and Technology Assisted Physical Activity (researchgate.net)

17) Llego, Mark Anthony/Buhay Guro DepEd Learning Delivery Modalities for School Year 2020-2021

18) Mercier, Kevin; Centejo, EriN; Garn, Alex; Erwin, Heather; and Martinen, Risto. (2021). Physical Education Teachers' Experiences with remote instruction during the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Retrieved from https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/40/2/article-p337.xml

19) Nenagh Kemp* and Rachel Grieve. (2014) Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning Nenagh Kemp* and Rachel Grieve Discipline of Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. fpsyg-05-01278.pdf

20) Research on Teaching Blended and Online Physical Education David N. Daum, University of Southern Indiana, ddaum@usi.edu Craig Buschner, California State University at Chico, cbuschner@csuchico.ed. Retrieved from 2811036.2811048.pdf

21) Teaching Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) Online: Challenges and Solutions A journal of educational research and practice 2020 Vol. 29 (2) 13-17 https://journals.library.brocku.ca/brocked Chunlei Lu, * Joe Barrett, Olivia Lu Brock University

VOlUME 02 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023